nytmag.gif (3879 bytes)

                                                          

download article

mag_coverright.jpg (46064 bytes)      

"Downtown is not the only part of the city requiring boldness. Peter De Pasquale and Pablo Lorenzo-Eiroa designed prototypes for residential buildings that could be placed anywhere in the city. De Pasquale's design, left, emphasizes communal gardens; Lorenzo-Eiroa proposes a twisting structure, right, that would allow residents to park cars outside their apartments...." NY Times Magazine, 9/8/2002.

 

PROJECT BRIEF

PROTOTYPE FOR BLOCK NO.2:

The programming for block no. 2 became a complement of the Downtown Athletic Club, an Art Deco skyscraper opened in 1930, accommodating various functions and facilities which catered to the private membership of businessmen and lawyers who worked in lower Manhattan. But at the same time extending the idea of a vertical building, to correspond to a more infrastructural problem below. Our proposal counters that of the formerly private athletic club, by opening the programs to a more comprehensive public and residential sort. By offering a range of to moderate-demand, to ultimately high-standard apartment living, this new fitness/cultural club begins to allow for an active scaling of people and events to occur as a dynamic through the building. The financing for the cultural-fitness vertical living programs could potentially feed from the benefits of high standard apartment housing. Retail and cultural programs within the lower access levels and lobbies will provide a public filter for the building, providing a filter for the public realm. The residential complex will allow a flexible living arrangement for all residents: the opportunity of temporality that a hotel offers, while offering the luxury of a residence that merges work/live/play through a vertical infrastructure. Residents have the ability to join their activities: whether live/work, work/play, or live/play. Our proposal blends a dynamic program structure: the athletic facilities: gymnasium, swimming pool, tennis & squash courts, aerobic & fitness training centers with cultural spaces: ballet and dancing halls with a dynamic residential use: a mostly temporal living space; where individuals may choose to stay for a shorter period of times allowing a steady stream of new inhabitants. This activity is also echoed through the use of the automobile, which travels to the apartment of its owner through an infrastructure which dissolves the boundaries between live/work/play. By directly connecting the fabric of highways below the building, to plaza level, and further to the individual apartments within the building: we are weaving the structure of "city" at various scales. By introducing and correlating different scales of infrastructure to pieces of program which are rarely associated, we create a potential for both to share territory in a vertical hybrid structure. The synthesis of these events is possible by saturating a composite dynamical infrastructure into a vertical residential core. The tall building as a club becomes an infrastructural unit playing the connections and fusions between live/work/play. The hybridity of programs and vertical mix-use allows for a new prototype of buidling beneficial to residents and the urban fabric of Lower Manhattan. The way that we approached the project for block number 2 is a way of developing “city” by means of tracing memory. We believe that the condition of the American city usually negates past by the substitution through tableau rasa.  In the case of the redevelopment of the World Trade Center, there is a large opposition in public opinion to this natural evolution of the American city, which we take as an opportunity.

 

The disappearance of the Twin Towers within the NY skyline is directly related with the identity of their facades. The lost identities of the people and the buildings both were dissipated into the ground. Then, as a mourning, the neighboring buildings became witnesses of the disaster by being wrapped in dark veils on their facades.  Gilles Deleuze in, “The Logic of Sensation: of Francis Bacon,” interprets diagrammatically the composition.  The relation between figure and field is performed by the use of a “curtain” or “veil” as Bacon describes.  Within Bacon’s “Pope series,” Deleuze describes this work between figure and veil, “as if the flesh of the figure was held by the folds of the curtain.”  Accordingly, the skin of our building is worked systematically by responding to the interior formal requirements of program, while articulating changes in scale.  The curtain is then articulated by scaled openings and closings, exposing/protecting the interior “flesh” of the building, while preserving the continuity of the fašade. The project develops a skin that integrates continuity in the streetscape of lower Manhattan, while introducing various scales of program into a new building. Temporal middle income housing (apart-hotel kind of typologies for temporal or long stays) are proposed for financing the other socio-cultural activities. The veil metaphor becomes a material to work with and to transform the past into a new way to do architecture.  Consequently, the skin allows continuity while containing big scales of internal programmatic fragmentations: a way to insert infrastructure diversity as a vertical hybrid.

 

Contextual infrastructure such as the highway below the building and the new proposed vertical inclusion of sports/fitness activities require adequate functional spaces. These programs are located in the north fašade of the proposal, facing the projected plaza (block No. 3), in order to integrate public open spaces with semi-private recreational activities. The inclusion of the car in the vertical dwellings (with the direct access from the proposed underground highway) inserts and hybridizes the relation in programming also, tensioning the use of the car as an extension of a working environment.

Pablo Lorenzo Eiroa / Meredith Bostwick.

 

NEW YORK TIMES MAGAZINE, 9/8/2002             

Herbert Muschamp Curator, NY Times Architecture Critic.

http://www.nytimes.com/library/magazine/home/20020908mag-index.html

"The Masters' Plan.Downtown Mahattan

Reimagined by a team of Architects Daring

New York to Think Big."

 

Project over West Street, prototype for block No. 2.

Pablo LORENZO-EIROA architecture studio

Pablo LORENZO-EIROA, Principal and Project Designer

Project Designer Meredith Lynn Bostwick

Consultant Carlos Majauskas